JRauto said:
If we could add the information that you've stated we missed out, do you think that the video would be something you'd watch?
How would I know of the existence of the video in the first place though. I've just visited your site and that's the first time I've seen or heard of it.
Also the only way to know whether the video tells me what I want to know is to watch it! The result will be I will either bookmark the site as being a good source of information, or like most of them ignore them as being just rehashed version of manufacturers press releases.
I have no interest in motoring sites in general, I just search for specific information. For instance (having just checked) I've looked at every link on the first 3 pages of a Google search on "Vauxhall Mokka". Similarly on YouTube. I will download those videos I find useful and ignore the rest.
With regard to a "new" review of the Mokka, then it should take into account the negatives posted elsewhere ie, the supposed agricultural and noisy diesel engine and comment accordingly, otherwise what use is the review? Similarly a degree of in depth research is required. For instance what is the truth of the assertion that the aforementioned tractor engine will be replaced by a new and more up to date 1.6 diesel engine in 2014. Then there is the most recent development whereby suspension and steering are being tweaked for the UK market following adverse press reviews.
I think what I am probably saying is that video reviews date too quickly. It's nice to see the pretty pictures, but for up to date information a text article is probably going to be more up to date.
I'm still very keen on the Mokka, but I want to know as much about the vehicle as possible before I consider a purchase. No single review will provide all this information, nor any single online forum.
Caveat Emptor!